Academic jargon and pretentious concept will make your prose turgid, absurd, and downright irritating.

Academic jargon and pretentious concept will make your prose turgid, absurd, and downright irritating.

Historians value plain English.Your professor will suspect that you want to conceal which you don’t have a lot of to state. Needless to say, historians can’t go along without some concept; also people who profess to possess no concept do—it’s called realism that is naпve. And quite often you want a technical term, be it ontological argument or fallacy that is ecological. They are intelligible and do real intellectual lifting when you use theory or technical terms, make sure that. Please, no sentences similar to this: “By way of a neo-Althusserian, post-feminist hermeneutics, this essay will de/construct the logo/phallo/centrism imbricated in the marginalizing post-colonial gaze that is gendered therefore proliferating the subjectivities that may re/present the de/stabilization of this essentializing habitus of post-Fordist capitalism.”

Continue reading →